I'm glad that many people have tried it (whether they liked it or not), because it's definitely an interesting concept for an 'efficient' method. I've always liked ZZ, and thought it was a really neat idea for a method. I've been on the forum for a bit over a year and have seen at least a dozen of these Roux vs CFOP vs ZZ threads. I also don't think that optimal stats will be able to tell us whether or not ZZ < CFOP and Roux, as fingertricks for optimal solutions are bad (?) and hard to find during a speedsolve.Īlso, I don't get why these thread keep popping up. However, I do think that CFOP is a very good method, just not one that I personally like. ZBLL is better than ZBLL+3.5k other algs/cases. As I said before, L moves are better than rotations and/or B moves.
EOLine fingertricky-ness is as bad as Cross. Looking ahead through EOLine is significantly more difficult, though I personally haven't put much effort into it yet. I don't think that EOLine is so much more difficult than Cross, though definitely is. IMO, alternating between R/L moves is better than doing rotations. I switched to ZZ from CFOP because I really hated rotations during F2L, and ZZ had a really nice move set. Like how some people don't like moves and call Roux bad, people don't like moves and call ZZ bad. Click to expand.I think these moves are just a preference thing.